Your Alabama Lawyer - Divorce, DUI, Bankruptcy, Personal Injury - Birmingham, Pelham, Calera, Chelsea, Jemison, Montgomery, Prattville

Contact a Lawyer

Full Name:

E-mail Address:

Phone Number:

Details:

= Required

LEGAL TIPS

Alabama DUI Views :
Alabama can't afford to look the other away at drunks who insist on getting behind the wheel. A few weeks ago in the Mobile area, a driver who was allegedly drunk struck and killed two bicyclists. Two years earlier, when he was a juvenile, the same driver killed another cyclist.

Lawyer FAQs

Get answers to the more common questions in the legal society today.

Alabama Personal Injury Defense Lawyers ( 1 items )

DUI & Driving Under The Influence:
Alabama & US DUI Laws :
It is also a criminal offense in all states to drive a vehicle while under the influence of drugs DUID, or under the combined influence of alcohol and drugs; the drugs themselves need not be illegal, but can be prescription or even over-the-counter. This offense requires evidence of impairment as a result of the drugs or drugs and alcohol, although some states have passed laws making driving with the mere presence of certain drugs a criminal offense.

Alabama DUI Views :
Alabama can't afford to look the other away at drunks who insist on getting behind the wheel. A few weeks ago in the Mobile area, a driver who was allegedly drunk struck and killed two bicyclists. Two years earlier, when he was a juvenile, the same driver killed another cyclist.

* No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality
of legal services performed by other lawyers. The information presented at this site should
not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.

All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2008 Richardson Law Offices, LLC

Glossary of Legal Terms :: Alabama Lawyers

DUI Driving Drunk :
But the law was changed and changed again - strengthened, in fact, to be less tolerant of multiple convictions. But a provision that stipulated four convictions in five years was inadvertently left in. The high court indicated that it had little choice. It could not consider seven convictions in 15 years as constituting four in five years.